Student Publications [Scholarly]
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Digital twins have become increasingly popular across various industries as dynamic virtual models of physical systems. In healthcare, Human Digital Twins (HDTs) serve as virtual counterparts to patients. According to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), a digital twin must be personalized, dynamically updated, and have predictive capabilities to—in the context of health care—inform clinical decision-making. This scoping review aims to assess the current state of HDTs in healthcare, examining whether the literature aligns with the NASEM definition and identifying trends. A systematic literature search was conducted, covering articles published from January 2017 to July 2024. Only 18 of the 149 included studies (12.08%) fully met the NASEM digital twin criteria. Digital shadows made up 9.4% of studies, general digital models comprised 10.07%, and virtual patient cohorts were another 10.07%. Only two studies mentioned verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification (VVUQ), a critical NASEM standard for model reliability. © The Author(s) 2025.
Publication Title
npj Digital Medicine
Publication Date
12-2025
Volume
8
Issue
1
ISSN
2398-6352
DOI
10.1038/s41746-025-01910-w
Keywords
digital twins, healthcare, clinical decision making
Repository Citation
Tudor, Brant H.; Burton, Robert; Johnson, Joyce T.; Shargo, Ryan; Gray, Geoffrey M.; Fierstein, Jamie L.; Kuo, Frederick H.; Scully, Brandi B.; Asante-Korang, Alfred; Rehman, Mohamed A.; and Ahumada, Luis M., "A scoping review of human digital twins in healthcare applications and usage patterns" (2025). Student Publications [Scholarly]. 62.
https://commons.clarku.edu/student_publications/62
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Conditions
Tudor, B. H., Shargo, R., Gray, G. M., Fierstein, J. L., Kuo, F. H., Burton, R., ... & Ahumada, L. M. (2025). A scoping review of human digital twins in healthcare applications and usage patterns. npj Digital Medicine, 8(1), 587.
