Psychology
Children's linguistic intuitions about factive presuppositions
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Third and sixth graders' understanding of factive presupposition was investigated via two tasks: One required an abstract truth value judgment of the verb complement; the other called for a more informal judgment of consistency (or contradiction) between the target sentence and the negation of its complement. When compared with corresponding adult data, the present results indicate that the development of factive presupposition continues through late childhood. A further task examined a nonlogical pragmatic variable related to factive meaning. The final task investigated whether children's judgments of overall certainty are governed by factive or pragmatic aspects of meaning. Comparisons across the four tasks indicate that factive presupposition only gradually emerges as a distinct logical component of verb meaning. It is argued that young children's initial discriminations between factive and nonfactive verbs reflect the subjective confidence conveyed by the verb rather than the logical property of factivity, but that later in acquisition, factivity acquires a status superseding that of other facets of meaning. © 1994.
Publication Title
Cognitive Development
Publication Date
1994
Volume
9
Issue
1
First Page
1
Last Page
22
ISSN
0885-2014
DOI
10.1016/0885-2014(94)90017-5
Keywords
abstract truth value judgment of verb complement vs inconsistency judgment of sentence complement, linguistic intuitions of factive presuppositions, 3rd vs 6th graders
Repository Citation
Falmagne, Rachel Joffe; Gonsalves, Joanna; and Bennett-Lau, Sarah, "Children's linguistic intuitions about factive presuppositions" (1994). Psychology. 810.
https://commons.clarku.edu/faculty_psychology/810