Download Full Text (75 KB)
The Risk Assessment Corporation (RAC) report reviewed here was intended to evaluate the potential health risks associated with the burning of a part of Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) during a wildfire in May of 2000. The authors presented a methodical approach that divided the problem into several components; contaminants were assessed according to their hazardous characteristics (radiological or chemical) and according to the two major pathways of exposure (air and water). Risks were estimated using measured concentrations of contamination where it was judged to be reasonable and using modeled concentrations of contamination where it was judged to be necessary.
This research was completed money allocated during Round 5 of the Citizens’ Monitoring and Technical Assessment Fund (MTA Fund). Clark University was named conservator of these works.
If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at email@example.com
nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons testing, environment, non-governmental organizations, United States Department of Energy, tribal governments, environmental cleanup, radioactive fallout, radioactive waste
Copyright belongs to the authors. Clark University was chosen by the non-profit peace and environmental groups as the conservator of these reports; our right to distribute these works ensures they remain available to the public in perpetuity as intended. Reuse at your own discretion with with due deference to copyright holders.
Clark University and Russ, Abel, "Comments on the 2002 Risk Assessment Corporation Analysis of Risks from the 2000 Cerro Grande Fire at Los Alamos National Laboratory" (2005). Clark University. 2.