Political Science
Crisis bargaining and third-party mediation: Bridging the gap
Document Type
Article
Abstract
The intersection of the study of bargaining and international crisis has proven a fertile area of inquiry that has notably excluded third-party mediation. This research chronicles this omission from the crisis bargaining literature, and seeks to identify whether mediation as a form of international crisis behavior merits inclusion in that literature. In conducting an empirical analysis of third-party mediation in international crisis, this study finds that mediation is in fact a prominent feature of international crisis, with the likelihood of mediation greatly increased in crises featuring a high overall level of violence as well as in crises of a military-security nature. On the basis of these empirical findings, this study concludes that third-party mediation is deserving of more systematic attention by scholars of crisis bargaining, offering suggestions for future inquiry to that end. © 2007 ? 2007 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, an imprint of Brill.
Publication Title
International Negotiation
Publication Date
6-2007
Volume
12
Issue
2
First Page
249
Last Page
274
ISSN
1382-340X
DOI
10.1163/138234007X223302
Keywords
conflict management, crisis bargaining, international crisis, third-party mediation
Repository Citation
Butler, Michael J., "Crisis bargaining and third-party mediation: Bridging the gap" (2007). Political Science. 37.
https://commons.clarku.edu/faculty_political_science/37